Peer Review

The more and more that I revised I feel as though I tend to understand the deeper meaning of the text and in this create a deeper meaning of editing in the text itself. In Leslie’s earlier essay, I make it clear that there is more involved in the actual understanding and requirements of the text and its meaning. There will always be a few places in the text where I edit more on a local level meaning places where I understand more about the grammar. As Illustrated by the text I seen the place more emphasis on the actual development of the ideology than I tend to detect places in the work causing the writer to work more towards development then grammatical issues. This is best illustrated in her essay as I what more of an explanation of the evidence of an author critically unpronounced in the work itself making him less prone in the text creating a vacuum where there should be an authors presence to boost the perspective argument in Leslie’s essay. I feel as though I’ve developed more into a person who not only understand to text and its meaning but wants to see better in the authors perspective on their writing. In the very beginning I did focus more on the local aspects such as placement of citations and grammar, but now I focus more on the individual argument that is made to strengthening their perspective

 

Leslie first draft